IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.116 Kishan Lal State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Ms. Suyma Mr. Ankur Mittal Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit No.3-Deputy Commissioner dated 16.02.2023 (Anne No.3 within three days from today. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction on the representation the petitioner to respondent No.3, opportunity of hearing to receipt of a copy of 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 17.09.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Ms. Suyma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Commissioner, Charkhi Dadri to take a decisi (Annexure P-1), which the petitioner shall submit to respondent No.3 within three days from today. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. representation dated 16.02.2023 (Annexure P the petitioner to respondent No.3, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within receipt of a copy of the representation dated 16.02.2023. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes / No Whether reportable: Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27734-2025 Date of decision : 17.09.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI for the petitioner. Addl. A.G., Haryana with Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, she would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to take a decision on the representation which the petitioner shall submit to respondent Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to respondent No.3 to take a decision (Annexure P-1), which may be submitted by by passing a speaking order and after affording , preferably within six weeks from the date of 16.02.2023. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2025.09.18 04:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document