CWP-27830-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 119 KEWAL KRISHAN STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondents to effect from 13.12.1996 respective date of joining Government instructions dated 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents legal notice, dated Elementary Education with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: KRISHAN AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioners at par with their junior with 13.12.1996 (notionally) and actually with effect from respective date of joining as ESHM, i.e., 19/20.06.2013 nstructions dated 18.12.2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioners will be satisfied in case pending legal notice, dated 14.05.2025 specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State , dated 14.05.2025, will be decided by Education, by passing a speaking with law within a period of three months. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27830-2025 Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA seeking a writ of mandamus directing fix the pay of the petitioners at par with their junior with (notionally) and actually with effect from their 19/20.06.2013, in terms of the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this atisfied in case respondent no.3 is directed to 14.05.2025, Annexure P-7, in a Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, /State and submits that the pending will be decided by respondent no.3/Director, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance directing fix the pay of the petitioners at par with their junior with their in terms of the submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a , the pending Director, order in accordance Aman Dua 2025.09.26 08:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-27830-2025 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 25.09.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.09.26 08:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document