GURTEJ SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/10083/2025 · 2025-09-16
Surya Partap Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101787 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101787 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-10083
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 126
GURTEJ SINGH
STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PRATAP SINGH
1.
directions to the respondent
2.
the petitione P-3) before the respondent No.2 stipulated time.
3.
10083-2025 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
GURTEJ SINGH & ANR.
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH
Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to respondents No.4 to 6.
The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation dated ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time.
Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10083-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.09.202
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH for the petitioners. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 12.09.2025 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a respondents No.1 to 3 only.
(O&M) .2025
.....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.17 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-10083
5.
disposing of the representation the respondent No.2 and accordingly
6.
hereby disposed of with a direction to representation within a period of 15 days from is further security to that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre perception to the petitioner petitioners make an independent and take a decision Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 10083-2025 (O&M) 8587
Learned counsel for the petitioner disposing of the representation of the petitioner respondent No.2 and that the instant writ accordingly.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order further directed that the petitioners shall security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre perception to the petitioners or the validity of the relationship of the petitioners. The police authority of District independent assessment of the threat perception and take a decision on the issue of providing
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
rned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) be given to the instant writ petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order the date of receipt of copy of instant order shall be provided requisite safety and life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre or the validity of the relationship of the . The police authority of District Sangrur shall be at liberty to threat perception to the petitioner providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No
submits that a direction for ) be given to petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is decide the by passing a speaking order the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and clarified observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat or the validity of the relationship of the shall be at liberty to to the petitioners, GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.17 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document