IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69181 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== 1 . Bhavendra Yadav @ Bhavendra Prasad Yadav S/o Baiju Yadav R/o Village- Modangachi, ward No 5, PS- Mokama, Distt- Patna, A/P - Mokama Munshipaliti, Naya Tola, ward no. 18, P.S.- Mokama, Distt.- Patna 2. Sudha Devi @ Sudha Rai W/o Bhavendra Yadav R/o Village- Modangachi, ward No 5, PS- Mokama, Distt- Patna, A/P - Mokama Munshipaliti, Naya Tola, ward no. 18, P.S.- Mokama, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajanan Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 80, 103 (1) and 3(5) of BNS. 3 . As per prosecution case , daughter of informant performed love marriage with co-accused Raushan Kumar 8 to 9 months ago and after the marriage , she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non- fulfillment of demand of dowry and ultimately the accused persons committed the murder of informant’s daughter. 4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in -law and petitioner no. 2 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69181 of 2025(3) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 is mother-in-law of the deceased. They are simply victim of over implications. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with deceased and her husband Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased who is already in custody . Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. 6. However, considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM IIIrd Barh Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T