Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101761 (MAD)

Nandhakumar v. The State Rep by, The sub Inspector of Police

CRL OP/24963/2025 · 2025-09-26

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.24963 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.24963 of 2025 1.Nandhakumar 2.Praveenkumar ... Petitioners Vs. The State Rep. By, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Omalur Police Station, Omalur, Salem District. Crime No.479 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.479 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioners : Mr.K.Vasanthanayagan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.24963 of 2025 The petitioners were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.08.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 286(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.479 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners waylaid de facto complainant and quarreled with him. Later, the petitioner along with other accused, came to his house, abused and assaulted the de facto complainant and his family with hands, knife and wooden log, thereby caused injuries to them. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioners. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of bail to the petitioners on the ground that the petitioner has one previous case. He further submitted that the injured persons have been discharged from the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.24963 of 2025 hospital. 5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the gravity of the offences, number of persons injured and bad antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 26.09.2025 cda K.RAJASEKAR, J. cda 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.24963 of 2025 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Omalur. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Omalur Police Station, Omalur, Salem District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras Crl.O.P.No.24963 of 2025 26.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis