DEEPAK YADAV AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/27700/2025 · 2025-09-22
Harsh Bunger
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101757 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101757 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-27700-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (151) CWP-27700-2025 Date of Decision:-22.09.2025 Deepak Yadav and Others ……Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Abhimanyu Antil, DAG Haryana. **** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral)
1. The present Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing respondent No.1 to decide Revision Petition (ROR) No.340 of 2025 (Annexure P-2) within a time-bound frame.
2. At this stage, Mr. Abhimanyu Antil, learned DAG, Haryana, appears and submits that the aforesaid revision petition filed by the petitioner is already fixed for consideration before the learned Financial Commissioner on 15.10.2025. He further submits that, in all probability, the stay application filed by the petitioner along with the said revision petition shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority on the date fixed, and in any case, not beyond a period of 10 days thereafter. -1- SHUBHAM 2025.09.24 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order
CWP-27700-2025
3. Keeping in view the stand taken by learned State counsel, the present writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
4. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. 22.09.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Shubham JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2- SHUBHAM 2025.09.24 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order