Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101745 (PNJ)

VIKAS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CRA-S/3796/2024 · 2025-07-30

Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-3796-2024 Date of decision: 30.07.2025 VIKAS ….Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Viney Saini, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J (Oral): 1. Learned counsel representing appellant states that present criminal appeal against the dismissal of regular bail, has rendered infructuous as the case has been finally decided by the trial Court. Therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. 2. In view of the statement, present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 30.07.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.08.01 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document