KIRTI BALASAHEB WATANE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/2626/2025 · 2025-02-24
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10174 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10174 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2626.25wp (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
62 WRIT PETITION NO. 2626 OF 2025 KIRTI BALASAHEB WATANE VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, LATUR
3. THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, NANDED
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT, PAY AND PROVIDENT FUND UNIT (SECONDARY), NANDED
5. RANI LAXMIBAI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, BHOKAR, DIST NANDED
6. SARASWATI VIDYA MANDIR SCHOOL, BHOKAR, DIST. NANDED …. Mr M. S. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr S. S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner Mr V. M. Kagne, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 4
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 24th February, 2025 PER COURT:
1. In the light of the fact that the petitioner is challenging the
order refusing to grant approval to her appointment, passed on 28/01/2025 by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded (Exhibit ‘H’), in the light of mechanism provided for under the Government Resolution dated 27/03/2024, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail of that remedy. 2025:BHC-AUG:5354-DB
2626.25wp (2)
2. The appellate authority shall not refuse to consider the appeal on the ground of limitation if it is preferred within two weeks from today.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) sjk