1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (116) CR-6608-2025 Date of Decision:-19.09.2025 SURINDER … Petitioner Versus SATBIR AND OTHERS ... Respondent -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. The present revision petition is not maintainable in view of the provisions of Order 43 Rule 2 read with Order 41 Rule 5 of CPC as petitioner has remedy of filing the stay application in the Appellate Court. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would move an application for early hearing of his appeal as well as application for stay during the pendency of the appeal. In case, any such application is moved, learned Appellate Court shall decide the same expeditiously. 3. In the light of above, the present petition is dismissed as not maintainable, so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 19.09.2025 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.20 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document