HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34120 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (Sl.No.44) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Uttra Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondent and Sri Ravi Prakash Pandey, who appears for the Varanasi Development Authroity. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 for giving the peaceful possession over the Plot No. E- 30 situated in Lalpur Awasiya Yojana Phase 1, Mauza- Lalpur Varanasi which has been executed through registered sale deed in favor of the petitioner after receiving the entire sale amount of Rs. 69,54,000/- by the Sahaayak Sampati Adhikari Varanasi Development Authority, Varanasi on 30.07.2016 after the allotment dated 30.032016 which has been given through auction proceeding to the petitioner being highest bidder in auction. II.Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.4 to provide the police security to the life and property of the petitioner from the unsocial element of the vicinity, who has created nuisance by raising illegal construction through encroachment over the said allotted Plot No. E-30 situated in Lalpur Awasiya Yojana Phase -1. Mauza- Lalpur Varanasi of the petitioner for which the petitioner has tried his best for getting the peaceful possession after depositing the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Kumar Singh, Shiv Veer Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Pandey Saurabh Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) entire sale consideration amount of Rs. 69,54,000/- of the said plot in account of the authority in pursuant to the execution of registered sale deed executed by the authority in favor of the petitioner on 30.07.2016. " 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is continuously running from pillar to post for getting possession over the allotted plot no. E30 ad measuring 358.13 square meter in Lalpur Residential Yojna, Ist Phase from last nine years after the execution of the registered sale deed dated 30.07.2016, which was executed by the Sahyak Sampati Adhikari, Varanasi Development Authority (V.D.A.) on the entire sale consideration of Rs. 69,54,000/- but no action has been taken by the respondent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had given an information to the respondent no.2 on 06.05.2024 with regard to the illegal constructions raised by some anti social elements over the allotted plot of the petitioner, upon which the Prabhari Adhikari (Sampatti) wrote a letter on the same day i.e. on 06.05.2024 to the Executive Engineer (Nriman) stating that no document has been received in respect of the physical possession of plot no. E-30. For ready reference, the relevant extract of the letter dated 06.05.2024 is being reproduced herein under: "कृ पया एतद् के साथ सलग्न श्री सौरभ कु मार िसह पुत्र स्व० राज कु मार िसह के प्राथर्ना पत्र िदनांक 06.05.2024 का सन्दभर् ग्रहण करने का कष्ट करे जो प्रािधकरण की लालपुर आवासीय योजना प्रथम चरण के अन्तगर्त इन्हें आंविटत भूखण्ड संख्या ई 30 पर अवैध लोगो द्वारा कब्जा िकये जाने िवषयक है। इस सम्बन्ध में अवगत कराना है िक श्री सौरभ कु मार िसह पुत्र स्व० राज कु मार िसह के नामें लालपुर आवासीय योजना प्रथम चरण के अन्तगर्त भूखण्ड संख्या ई 30 की फ्री होल्ड रिजस्ट्री िदनांक 30.07.2016 को िनष्पािदत हो चुकी है तथा कायार्लय पत्र संख्या- 425/िवण्प्रा०/सम्पित्त/2017-18 िदनांक 20.07.2017 द्वारा पक्ष को भूखण्ड का भौितक कब्जा दखल प्रदान िकये जाने हेतु प्रेिषत िकया गया था। उक्त पत्र के सापेक्ष आवंटी को भौितक कब्जा दखल प्रदान िकया गया अथवा नहीं इसका कोई अिभलेख सम्पित्त अनुभाग को प्राप्त नहीं है। अतः कृ पया उपरोक्त विणत के क्रम में सम्बिन्धत को आवश्यक कायर्वाही हेतु िनदेर्िशत करने का कष्ट करें।" 4. In this backdrop, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid communication clearly reflects that till date actual possession of the plot in question is not ensured to be given to the petitioner. He lastly submits that the VDA must ensure compliance of its own orders and hand over possession of the plot in question to the petitioner, who is suffering irreparable loss and injury on account of such encroachment. WRIC No. 34120 of 2025 2 5. The factum of controversy has duly been acknowledged by the learned counsel for the respondents, as it is not in dispute that the petitioner is rightful allottee of the plot in question. It is also undisputed that he has already deposited the requisite amount towards the allotment. 6. Considering the factual situation, the writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction that the VDA shall comply with its own orders, in accordance with law, within three weeks from the date of production of an application along with a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Ashish Pd. WRIC No. 34120 of 2025 3 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad