IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYA 108 PARVEEN KAUR AND ANR STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2. the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, directed to look into the representation dated made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. and their dates of birth are copies of their respectively. They got married is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYA CHANDIGARH PARVEEN KAUR AND ANR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Constitution of India for issuance of direct to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will b Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, directed to look into the representation dated made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both and their dates of birth are 19.06.2005 and 01.01.2000 copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P respectively. They got married on 11.09.2025 is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10110-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 17.09.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 11.09.2025 (Annexure P-5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major 19.06.2005 and 01.01.2000, respectively. The cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, 11.09.2025 and the Marriage Certificate -3. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.17 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-10110-2025 -2- 4. Notice of motion. 5. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 11.09.2025 (Annexure P-5), and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. 17.09.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.17 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.