Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101694 (ALL)

BRIJESH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14853/2025 · 2025-09-25

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14853 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "i- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.3 to forward the papers for regularization before the Regional Level Committee/respondent No.2 for regularization within a reasonable time which, is fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents-authorities to regularize the service of the petitioner and not to interfere in peaceful functioning of the petitioner as L.T. Grade Teacher in the Institution namely Nehru Inter College Kunwardah Jaunpur and also paid salary admissible to the post, during the pendency of the instant writ petition before this Hon'ble Court. iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to directing respondent No.3 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner dated 28-7-2025 within a reasonable time which is fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Brijesh Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, District Inspector of Schools, Jaunpur is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 14853 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad