Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101690 (ALL)

SAKLAIN v. BARAKAT AND 3 OTHERS

A227/11836/2025 · 2025-09-24

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11836 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I. Issue an order or direction to the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) F.T.C. I Deoria, District Deoria to decide the Restoration Application vide Restoration Application no. 211 of 2025 filed in original suit no. 196 of 2012 (Saklain Vs.Barakat and others) within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that restoration application is pending since 28.05.2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) F.T.C. I Deoria, District Deoriato consider and decide the aforementioned restoration application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shatrughan Yadav, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Saklain .....Petitioner(s) Barakat And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad