VINAY KUMAR AGRAWAL AND 3 OTHERS v. PANJAB NATIONAL BANK BRANCH MEHMOORGANJ
A227/11944/2025 · 2025-09-25
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11944 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
" It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Varanasi to decide the application 6C in Case No. 1055 of 2025 (Vinay Kumar Agrawal & Others Vs Punjab National Bank) within a reasonable time as fixed by this Hon'ble court, otherwise Plaintiffs/Petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. It is further be pleased to direct the respondent not to interfering in the peaceful possession of petitioner over Plot No. 21, House No. B21/128-129, Appu Ghar, Kamachha, City Varanasi and further not to taking any coercive measure against the petitioners, during the pendency of application 6C pending before Ld. Court, otherwise Plaintiffs/Petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss and injury"
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh, Tej Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Vinay Kumar Agrawal And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Panjab National Bank Branch Mehmoorganj .....Respondent(s)
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Varanasi to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
September 26, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 11944 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad