IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2569 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2020 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Maslehuddin Miya @ Musl Huddin, Son of Late Nazrulo Haque, Resident of Village- Bajitpur, P.S.- Dilalpur, District- Kishoreganj, Bangladesh, Permanent resident of Village- Shreepur Jabdi, Kamiyahi, Ward No.-5, P.S.- Bhantapari, District- Sunsari, Nepal ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Home Secretary, Patna. 2. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, Bureau of Immigration, Officer of Assistant Foreigner's Regional Registration Officer. 3. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The Inspector General of Police Government of Bihar at Purnea. 5. The District Magistrate at Araria 6. The Superintendent of Police at Araria 7. The Officer In-Charge Narpatganj, (Basmatiya) Police Station, Araria ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Md Azim Uddin, Advocate For the UoI : Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Dy. SGI For the State : Mr. P.N. Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 15 30-10-2025 Mr. P.N. Sharma, learned AC to AG for the State of Bihar has placed before this Court the instructions received from the Superintendent of Police, Araria as contained in the 8th supplementary statement of facts dated 29.10.2025. Learned AC to AG has informed that the petitioner has already been deported to Nepal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2569 of 2024(15) dt.30-10-2025 2/2 petitioner has already been deported. 3. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of as having become infructuous. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case where the respondent authorities have taken much efforts to find out the citizenship and actual place of residence of the petitioner and it could become possible only after the repeated orders and directions of this Court and the efforts of the respondents, this Court is of the considered opinion that it would not be a fit case for award of any compensation. 5. The prayer for compensation is, thus, rejected. lekhi/- (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Sourendra Pandey, J) U