NISHU ALIAS SURENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/1896/2021 · 2025-03-05
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10167 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10167 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1896 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Gaurav Panwar, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painly, B.H. for the State.
3. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Advocate for respondent no.3.
4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as charge sheet has already been submitted in the matter on 23.08.2021, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
05.03.2025 SK