Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101659 (PNJ)

KAKA SINGH@MAJOR SINGH v. BHURA SINGH & OTHERS

RSA/6415/2018 · 2025-09-02

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 241+108 Kaka Singh @ Major Singh Bhura Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff decreed. 2. that the instant second appeal has been disposed of as such 3. the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the 4. of, as having been rendered 5. 02.09.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Kaka Singh @ Major Singh Versus Bhura Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. JS Khiva, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. RVS Chugh, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant-defendant No. 1 is in second appeal against concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the Courts below whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondents No. 1 and 2 was At the very outset, learned counsel for the that the instant second appeal has been rendered infructuous disposed of as such as, the final decree has been passed. Learned counsel for respondent No the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the In view of the above, the present as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-6415-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. JS Khiva, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. RVS Chugh, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. defendant No. 1 is in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the Courts below respondents No. 1 and 2 was very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits rendered infructuous and may be final decree has been passed. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has not dispute the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant. the present second appeal is disposed Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the Courts below respondents No. 1 and 2 was appellant submits and may be has not dispute disposed RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.03 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.