HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33445 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajiv Ratan, learned counsel for the first informant (upon appearance filed today) and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.219 of 2025, under Sections-115(2), 352, 351(3), 132, 121(1), 121(2) of BNS, 2023, Police Station-Dadon, District-Aligarh, during the pendency of the trial. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the allegation in the FIR, the co-accused had beaten the injured and also snatched away his aadhaar card, ATM and mobile and it was further alleged in the FIR that when the injured came out of shop then the present applicant along with other persons had beaten the injured. It is further submitted that the applicant has criminal history of one petty case. It is also submitted that the injured in his statement did not make any specific allegation against the applicant and all the injuries caused to the injured are caused by hard and blunt object which was assigned by the co-accused. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 15.08.2025. In case, he is granted bail, provided he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant as well as learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that injured is Sub-Inspector in police, he was beaten by the applicant and other co-accused persons while he was on duty. Therefore, applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar, Nitish Patel, Ritik Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay @ Nanuka .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant- Vinay @ Nanuka, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 13, 2025 S.C. BAIL No. 33445 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad