Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7013 OF 2020 Between: Mabbu Ademma, W/o. Late Muni Krishna Reddy, Aged about 65 years Occ: No.11-114, Telephone Colony, Avilala Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal Chittoor District. Andhra Pradesh State. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor District at Chittoor. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4. The Tahsildar, Tirupati Urban Mandal. Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the highhanded action of the respondents in trying to disposes the petitioner from the agricultural land an extent of Ac. 1.16 cents in Sy. No.492/2, an extent of Ac. 1.16 cents in Sy.No. 492/3 and an extent of Ac. 1.08 cents in Sy.No. 492/4, total an extent of Ac. 3.30 cents of Avilala Village Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District (Previously Chandragiri Taluk) without following procedure contemplated under The
Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition) of Transfers) Act, 1977 (As amended by Act 11 of 2019) is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable Articles 14,19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 and violation of Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere or dispossess the petitioners from the agricultural land an extent an extent of Ac. 1.16 cents in Sy. No.492/2, an extent of Ac. 1.16 cents in Sy.No. 492/3 and an extent of Ac. 1.08 cents in Sy.No. 492/4, total an extent of Ac. 3.30 cents of Avilala Village Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of Justice.
lA NO: 2 OF 2070 Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of order in WP.No. 4554/2020 dated 27.02.2020 and same may be read as part and parcel of this Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER praying that in the circumstances
r 4fe APHC010114482020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7013/2020 Between: Mabbu Ademma, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CHVENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER: Heard the
learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
2. Challenging the action of the respondents in proposing to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land in an extent of Ac. 1.16 / cents in Sy.No.492/2, Ac. 1.16 cents in Sy.No.492/3, Ac. 1.08 cents in Sy.No.492/4, total an extent of Ac.3.30 cents in Avilala Village, Tirupathi
f T 2 Rural Mandal, Chittoor District (Previously Chandragiri Taluk) without following procedure contemplated under the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, the present writ petition is filed.
3. Both the learned counsels would submit that similar matter was
disposed of by this court in W.P.No.4554 of 2020.
4. The Registry is directed to append a copy of the order passed in W.P.No.4554 of 2020, dated 04.02.2025 to this order.
5. In terms of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioners are directed to cooperate with the conducting of the proceedings that are pending before the Tahsildar - 4*^ respondent, pursuant to the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 04.06.2011 and the Tahsildar is
directed to pass the appropriate orders in the case as expeditiously as possible within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of the orders. Till passing of such orders, the respondents
directed not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land. are As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Chittoor District at Chittoor.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District.
4. The Tahsildar, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District.
5. One CC to Sri Ch; Venkat Raman, Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
7. Three C.D. Copies Cnr (Along with Copy of Order dated 04.02.2025 in WP. No. 4554 of 2020) To,
HIGH COURT DATED:04/02/2025
ORDER WP.No.7013 of 2020 IS MAR 2025 | . Current Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS
APHC010075952020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 4554/2020 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Dama Murali, and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner{S):
1.CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 1
ORDER: Heard the
learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Challenging the action of the respondents in proposing to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land in an extent of Ac.5.64 cents in Sy.Nos.492/5, 492/6, 492/7, 492/8 and 492/9 of Avilala Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District (Previously Chandragiri Taluk)
2. without following procedure contemplated under the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, the present writ petition is filed. 3. It is contended that the petitioners have purchased the subject land through a registered sale deed, dated 07.04.1966. The predecessors and title were assigned with the subject land vide DKT Patta No.7/33, dated 31.10.1979. The dated 17.07.1923 and DKT Patta No.403/4/1389 petitioners after purchasing the subject land from the assignees have been in possession and occupation of the same. While so, the 4'" respondent initiated proceedings under provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, and issued notice in Form I & II to the petitioners and the transferors. The A* respondent passed the order of resumption on 01.09.2007 resuming the land. Against the said order, it is stated that an appeal was filed before the 3'" respondent. The 3™ respondent, vide order, dated 04.06.2011 has set aside the order of the 4"’ respondent and remanded the matter to the 4 respondent for fresh enquiry. Since then, no orders have been passed. In 2019, in order to issue house site pattas in favour of the beneficiaries of the Scheme of the Government viz., ‘Navaratnalu Pedallandariki lllu’, the respondents have tried to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land without passing any orders on the proceedings which were remanded to the 4*^ respondent
3 % by the 3'"' respondent on 04.06.2011. Thus prays for allowing the writ petition. This Court, vide order, dated 27.02.2020, granted interim order, directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land. 4. During the course of hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed before the Court a copy of the instructions, dated 09.12.2024 received by him from the Tahsildar in A perusal of the same would reflect that pursuant to the directions of the Revenue Divisional Officer, notices have been issued to the petitioners to attend for enquiry on 19.09.2020. The matter was heard and counsels for the petitioners who have attended for hearing have also filed written instructions.
On 23.09.2020, the matter was listed for further hearing and the same was posted to 29.09.2020. At that stage, the petitioners have filed W.P.Nos. 17746 of 2020 and W.P.No.17517 of 2020 challenging the proceedings of the authorities in conducting enquiry. Learned Assistant Government Pleader thus contends that notices were issued by the Tahsildar in order to pass appropriate orders pursuant to the directions of the Revenue Divisional Officer on 04.06.2011. 5. the case. Since, this Court on 28.01.2025 directed the Office to verify and tag all the connected writ petitions to the present writ petition, the
6. 4 Office has put up the report stating that the earlier W.P.Nos. 17446 17517 of 2020 were dismissed as withdrawn. and
7. Considered the rival submissions. The petitioners are directed to cooperate with the conducting of the proceedings that are pending before the Tahsildar - 4‘^ respondent, pursuant to the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 04.06.2011 and the Tahsildar is directed to pass the appropriate orders in the case as expeditiously as possible within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of the orders. Till passing of such orders, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land. 8. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date; 04.02.2025 MSI