Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10164 (JHR)

RAKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2812/2025 · 2025-07-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:19457 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2812 of 2025 ------ Rakesh Kumar, aged about 25 years, S/o-Kalicharan Mandal, R/o- Burikurwa, P.O.-Dumka, P.S.-Taljhari, District-Dumka, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr.Tiwari, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 16-07-2025 I.A. No.7929 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application. Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2812 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No.51 of 2024 registered under Section 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case, only on the basis of recovery of two mobile phones with three sim cards from his possession. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that there is no money trail is involved in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.12.2024 as is evident from para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dumka in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No.51 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/