2025:HHC:28659 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.394 of 2020 Decided on: 25.08.2025 Jagdish Kumar & another … Petitioners Versus Mandir Bhothnath Ji & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 and 4. Respondents No.5 and 6 ex parte. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondents No.1 and 2 informs the Court that the petitioner approached this Court against an ad interim order passed in an application filed under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, which application has been finally disposed of in terms of order dated 07.03.2024, passed by the learned Trial Court. Learned Senior Counsel has shown the order that has been passed by the learned Trial Court in the application filed under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, in terms thereof, the application has been 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:28659 finally disposed of. 2. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that despite his best endeavour, no instructions are coming- forth from the petitioners. 3. In light of this development, as obviously this petition looses its efficacy, the same is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 25, 2025 (Rishi)