Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101611 (ALL)

SAVITA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14620/2025 · 2025-09-24

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14620 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Adarsh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2 District Basic Education Officer, Mau to consider the claim of the petitioner for payment of salary along with arrears for the post of Assistant Teacher (Games) in Deen Dayal Balika Junior High School, Bhelur Changeri, Mau, within stipulated period as fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has moved representation before the competent authority, for redressal of her grievance, but nothing has been done till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that he has no objection in case fresh a representation is moved by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents as well as judgements, as may be advised, before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Indra Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Savita Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent no.2 District Basic Education Officer, Mau, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 14620 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad