ANUJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14630/2025 · 2025-09-24
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101609 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101609 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14630 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:-
" i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 District Inspector of Schools, Kaushambi, to consider the claim of the petitioners for grant of financial approval on the post of Assistant Teachers in Sri Ram Uttar Madhyamik Sanskrit Vidhyalay, Lahure Charva, Charva Kaushambi, within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioners are directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 District Inspector of Schools, Kaushambi within 15 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Indra Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anuj Kumar Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 25, 2025 AKT WRIA No. 14630 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad