CRM-M-52322 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (126) Mahabir State of Haryana CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. order dated 25.08.2025 passed by the learned Trial Court, Palwal, whereby the bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled and his bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited. 2. for exemption from personal appearance, along with the medical record/OPD card, was duly filed learned trial Court refused to accept the same and did not even mark the presence of the counsel who was present in Court. He further submits that the affidavit of the medical record, is appended as Annexure P 3. brought to the notice of the authorities, and an application has filed before the Public Inform concerned C 52322-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Mohan Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. (through VC). ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 25.08.2025 passed by the learned Trial Court, Palwal, whereby the bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled and his bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application for exemption from personal appearance, along with the medical PD card, was duly filed on the date of hearing rial Court refused to accept the same and did not even mark the presence of the counsel who was present in Court. He further submits that the affidavit of the said date, along with a cop medical record, is appended as Annexure P- Learned counsel also submits that the said occurrence was brought to the notice of the authorities, and an application has filed before the Public Information Officer seeking CCTV footage Court to substantiate the anomaly. It is further submitted that the -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52322-2025 Date of Decision:- 16.09.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN Mr. Mohan Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 25.08.2025 passed by the learned Trial Court, Palwal, Haryana, whereby the bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled and his bail bonds Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application for exemption from personal appearance, along with the medical on the date of hearing. However, the rial Court refused to accept the same and did not even mark the presence of the counsel who was present in Court. He further submits that , along with a copy of the application and -2 with this petition. Learned counsel also submits that the said occurrence was brought to the notice of the authorities, and an application has also been ation Officer seeking CCTV footage of the to substantiate the anomaly. It is further submitted that the - 16.09.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondent The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the Haryana, whereby the bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled and his bail bonds Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application for exemption from personal appearance, along with the medical . However, the rial Court refused to accept the same and did not even mark the presence of the counsel who was present in Court. He further submits that y of the application and Learned counsel also submits that the said occurrence was been of the to substantiate the anomaly. It is further submitted that the MANJU 2025.09.16 16:53 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-52322 petitioner is a scientist working in Bangalore and that the trial proceedings have not been delayed due to his absence. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the State. 5. the matter is listed before the trial Court for 17.09.2025, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Trial Court within 15 days from today and further directed that not forfeited till date, shall be considered petitioner be granted the 6. within 15 d before the Trial Court on the date 17.09.2025 7. the trial proceedings and a detailed and 8. order in furtherance of the order dated 25.08.2025 for the next 15 days, to enable the peti 9. September 16, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 52322-2025 petitioner is a scientist working in Bangalore and that the trial proceedings have not been delayed due to his absence. Notice of motion. Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without going into the merits of the case, and considering that the matter is listed before the trial Court for 17.09.2025, the petitioner is irected to appear before the Trial Court within 15 days from today and further directed that the bail bonds and surety bonds already submitted not forfeited till date, shall be considered and petitioner be granted the concession of bail. That, after the petitioner appea days as directed above, the petitioner shall ensure his presence before the Trial Court on the date so fixed and shall not seek any adjournment. De hors the above, the Trial Court is also directed to the trial proceedings and any order of adjournment detailed and well reasoned. In the meantime, the Trial Court shall not pass any adverse order in furtherance of the order dated 25.08.2025 for the next 15 days, to enable the petitioner to appear before it. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. September 16, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2- petitioner is a scientist working in Bangalore and that the trial proceedings Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, Without going into the merits of the case, and considering that the matter is listed before the trial Court for 17.09.2025, the petitioner is irected to appear before the Trial Court within 15 days from today and it is the bail bonds and surety bonds already submitted, if and restored and accordingly the ars before the learned trial Court he petitioner shall ensure his presence fixed by the learned trial Court after and shall not seek any adjournment. the above, the Trial Court is also directed to expedite ny order of adjournment if passed, should be In the meantime, the Trial Court shall not pass any adverse order in furtherance of the order dated 25.08.2025 for the next 15 days, to disposed of accordingly. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE - petitioner is a scientist working in Bangalore and that the trial proceedings Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, Without going into the merits of the case, and considering that the matter is listed before the trial Court for 17.09.2025, the petitioner is it is if the t he petitioner shall ensure his presence by the learned trial Court after expedite be In the meantime, the Trial Court shall not pass any adverse order in furtherance of the order dated 25.08.2025 for the next 15 days, to MANJU 2025.09.16 16:53 I agree to specified portions of this document