Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101602 (PNJ)

RUCHIKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/10071/2025 · 2025-09-16

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

126 CRWP-10071-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10071-2025 Date of decision: 16.09.2025 RUCHIKA AND ANR. ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Ms. Tanya Vashist, Advocate and Mr. Amit Khari, Advocate for the petitioner. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 to 9 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 12.09.2025 (Annexure P-6) to the Superintendent of Police, District Bhiwani and they shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 12.09.2025 (Annexure P-6). 2. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, Sr. DAG Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Puneet Sharma 2025.09.16 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 126 CRWP-10071-2025 -2- 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2–The Superintendent of Police, District Bhiwani is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation dated 12.09.2025 (Annexure P-6) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any. 5. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 16.09.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.09.16 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment