Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10160 (GAU)

SABITA HAZARIKA GOGOI (ALIAS SMTI. MANU HAZARIKA) v. DULU HAZARIKA AND ANR

CRP(IO)/116/2024 · 2025-04-20

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010068762024 2025:GAU-AS:4762 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/116/2024 SABITA HAZARIKA GOGOI (ALIAS SMTI. MANU HAZARIKA) D/O- LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA, W/O- SRI PRANJU GOGOI, R/O- WARD NO. 4, BOKAKHAT TOWN, P.O. AND P.S. BOKAKHAT, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785612. VERSUS DULU HAZARIKA AND ANR W/O- LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA, ORIGINALLY RESIDENT OF GOURISAGAR, VILL- PHUKAN-PHODIA GAON, NEAR BISHNU DOL, P.O. AND P.S. GOURISAGAR, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT WARD NO. 4 BOKAKHAT TOWN, P.S. AND P.O. BOKAKHAT, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785612. 2:TUTU HAZARIKA D/O- LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA W/O- SRI RIPUL DUTTA PRESEMTLY RESIDING AT VILL.- KOLAKHOWA BOKAKHAT P.O. AND P.S. BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785612 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR, MR R SENSUA,A M AHMED,R A LAHKAR Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : CRP(IO)/36/2024 SABITA HAZARIKA GOGOI @ SMTI. MANU HAZARIKA D/O- LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA W/O- SRI PRANJU GOGOI R/O- WARD NO. 4 BOKAKHAT TOWN P.O. AND P.S. BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785612. VERSUS DULU HAZARIKA AND ANR W/O- LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA ORIGINALY RESIDENT OF GOURISAGAR VILL.- PHUKAN-PHODIA GAON NEAR BISHNU DOL P.O. AND P.S. GOURISAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT WARD NO. 4 BOKAKHAT TOWN PS AND PO BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785612. 2:TUTU HAZARIKA D/O- LATE RAMANI HAZARIKA W/O- SRI RIPUL DUTTA PRESENTLY RESIDING AT KOLAKHOWA VILLAGE BOKAKHAT PS AND PO BOKAKHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785612. Advocate for the appellant(s): Mr. R Sensua Advocate for the respondent(s): Page No.# 3/3 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 21.04.2025 Mr. R Sensua, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in both the revision applications submitted that he has instruction to withdraw the instant revision applications in view of the amicable settlement. 2. Taking into account the above, both the revision applications stand closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant