Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101598 (ALL)

NITIN VINAYAK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34883/2025 · 2025-10-06

Indrajeet Shukla, Saumitra Dayal Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34883 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the notice of the petition on Mohd. Afzal learned counsel for RERA, during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mukul Tripathi learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mohd. Afzal learned counsel for respondent No. 2. 3. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus upon respondent No. 3 for recovery of Rs. 73,38,147.33/- together with interest from respondent No. 4 pursuant to the order dated 01.11.2021 passed by respondent No. 2. 4. Without entering into the merits, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon respondent No. 3 to make best efforts to ensure that necessary recovery is made strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably before 31.12.2025, if there is no legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Faraz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Bahadur Singh, Anil Kumar Pandey, Rajnish Kumar, Vijaya Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Nitin Vinayak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad