IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.4415 of 2025 Date of Decision: 26.03.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Vishawjit Chander ……...Petitioner Versus HPSEBL through its Executive Director and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Vandana Mishra, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide her case in terms of judgment dated 28.05.2024 passed by Principal Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.2274 of 2021, titled as Satya Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others alongwith connected matters, in a time bound manner. 2. Ms. Vandana Mishra, learned Counsel, while putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass detailed speaking order thereupon, taking note of judgment passed by Principal Division Bench of this Court in Satya Devi’s case(supra). Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 26th March, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), Mamta Judge 2