HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11842 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " 1. Issue a writ, order or direction to Civil Judge (Junior Division) Chhata, Mathura to decide 6C application dated 07.02.2023 in Original Suit No. 59 of 2023 (Chetram Versus Parmanandi), within stipulate period fixed by this Hon'ble Court, which is pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chhata, Mathura.(Annexure No.1 to this petition)" 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Chhata, Mathura to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munendra Nath Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Parmanandi .....Petitioner(s) Chetram .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad