Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101571 (PNJ)

SURESH KUMAR SAYAL v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

CRR/9854/2018 · 2025-09-02

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 240 CRR-9854-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2025 Suresh Kumar Sayal ...Petitioner VERSUS State of UT Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Gauri C. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Addl. PP U.T. Chandigarh. None for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 13.11.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh whereby the application instituted by the petitioner under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. seeking stay of operation of the order of conviction dated 08.06.2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh, has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties do not dispute that vide order dated 03.04.2025 passed in CRM-M-8465-2025 titled as ‘Suresh Kumar Sayal Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and another’, the FIR itself has been quashed alongwith other consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 3. In view of the aforesaid undisputed position of facts and law, no actionable cause would survive any further. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 4. All pending civil misc. application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 02.09.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.03 17:56 I am the author of this document