Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10156 (RAJ)

TEEKA RAM MEENA S/O SH. RAMPHOOL MEENA v. THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

CW/3444/2025 · 2025-03-11

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11032] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3444/2025 Teeka Ram Meena S/o Sh. Ramphool Meena, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Village- Sarsali, Tehsil- Bamanwas, Sawai Madhopur- Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoyi Nagar, Jaipur- 302005. 2. The Secretary (Admn.) Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoyi Nagar, Jaipur- 302005 (Rajasthan) 3. Personnel Officer (Enq.) Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoyi Nagar, Jaipur- 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M. S. Raghav Mr.Vishesh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr.Avi Sharma for Mr.Shailesh Prakash Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/03/2025 1. After arguing the matter for some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner for filing representation in the light of the judgement passed by this Court in the case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2358/2018. Counsel submits that issue involved in this petition has been covered by the case of Raghuveer Singh (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:11032] (2 of 2) [CW-3444/2025] 2. Considering the above limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty aforesaid to the petitioner. 3. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months thereafter. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/15