HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32998 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Sri Kartikey Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Raj Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Shiv Dutt Shukla, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No.2008 of 2018 (State Vs. Satyabhama Goyal), arising out of Case Crime No.818 of 2017, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Basti, as well as charge sheet dated 12.01.2018 and cognizance/summoning order dated 27.03.2018, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Basti, on the basis of compromise. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned. He further submits that a true copy of the compromise as well as copy of compromise verification report is also on record as annexure No.S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit. It is further contended that applicant had earlier approached this Court by means of filing an application under section 482 No.12495 of 2018, which was disposed of with the direction to the court concerned that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004(57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kartikey Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Raj Kumar Chauhan, G.A. Satyabhama Goyal And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Supreme Court, reported in 2009(3) ADJ 322(SC), Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.. It is further contended that subsequently the parties have entered into compromise. It is further contended that matter relates to some civil dispute between the parties regarding purchase of the land. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case No.2008 of 2018 (State Vs. Satyabhama Goyal), arising out of Case Crime No.818 of 2017, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Basti, as well as charge sheet dated 12.01.2018 and cognizance/summoning order dated 27.03.2018, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Basti, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 16, 2025 VKG A482 No. 32998 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad