Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3037 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
1. This petition purportedly in public interest has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the setting up of mobile tower at the house of respondent no. 7.
2. Submissions have been made that the petitioner has made several representations to the district administration against setting up of mobile tower, however, no action has been taken on the said representations.
3. Submissions have also been made that the mobile tower, if established, would affect the health of the people living around the said tower and, therefore, in public interest, the respondents be restrained from permitting erection of mobile tower over the house of respondent no. 7.
4. We have considered the submissions made and have perused the material available on record.
5. This Court in Asha Mishra Vs. State of U.P.: (2017) 1 UPLBEC 261 and Residents Welfare Association Vs. Union of India: Writ C No. 16888 of 2022 decided on 11.11.2022, after considering all the related aspects of the matter, has come to the conclusion that there is no scientific sanction qua the submissions made pertaining to alleged ill effects of setting up of mobile tower and seeking to restrain the erection of the mobile tower on the said ground is baseless. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukul Yadav, Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Nath Tripathi, Alok Tripathi Mehmood Husain .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 6 others .....Respondent(s)
6. In view thereof, we do not find any reason to entertain the present petition, the same is, therefore, dismissed. September 25, 2025 Sandeep/Pkb WPIL No. 3037 of 2025 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad