Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101533 (PNJ)

SUKHPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/52134/2025 · 2025-09-16

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 103 Sukhpreet Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab Mr. Robindeep Singh Bhullar, Advocate, for the complainant. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The present petition has been filed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case FIR NO. 47 dated 01.05.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (offence under Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983 added later on) at Police Station Jaito, Distr Faridkot. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner is respondents. He thus seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to file a 3. In view of the above, the present petition is withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. 16.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52134 Date of decision: Sukhpreet Singh . VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ r. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab Mr. Robindeep Singh Bhullar, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR NO. 47 dated 01.05.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (offence under Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983 added later on) at Police Station Jaito, Distr Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in the stage of negotiation of respondents. He thus seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to file a fresh petition. In view of the above, the present petition is with liberty as aforesaid. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 52134-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 16.09.2025 ..Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Robindeep Singh Bhullar, Advocate, The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR NO. 47 dated 01.05.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (offence under Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983 added later on) at Police Station Jaito, District Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends the stage of negotiation of a settlement with the respondents. He thus seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.16 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document