HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34376 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed against a remand order by which the Commissioner has remanded back the matter to be taken again before revenue authorities under 98(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 3. No case for interference is made out in the writ petition as the matter has been remanded to be heard afresh after hearing the parties. 4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of requiring the respondent no. 3 to proceed with the matter and decide the same, strictly in accordance with post remand, after hearing all the parties, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that the matter has not been adjudicated on merits. September 26, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tej Bahadur Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Dev Narayan And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad