VINOD AGRAHARI AND 2 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 12 OTHERS
WRIC/32665/2024 · 2025-07-09
S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109740 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32665 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinod Agrahari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prasoon Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard Sri Prasoon Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Dinesh Kumar Verma, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous and as such he does not want to press the same.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Abhishek Gupta Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad