Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101514 (ALL)

CHHATTU PRASAD AND 2 OTHERS v. RAM BHAWAN AND 2 OTHERS

A227/11773/2025 · 2025-09-24

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11773 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "direct the the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Court No. 20, Deoria to decide the Case No. 1005 of 2001 (Sudama and Another Versus Ramji), (Annexure No. 3 to this petition)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2001, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.20, Deoria to decide the above- mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akash Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Chhattu Prasad And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Ram Bhawan And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad