HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11835 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "a) Issue, an order or direction to the trial court/learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), District-Basti to decide the case No. 510/2022 (CNR No. UPBS5060007112022) (Radheshyam and another Vs. Ravipal) U/S 38 of Special Relief Act, 1963 expeditiously/within a time bound period. b) Issue, an order or direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District-Basti to decide the temporary injunction application "6C" expeditiously/within a time bound period expeditiously/within a time bound period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), District-Basti to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Radheshyam And Another .....Petitioner(s) Ravipal Singh .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad