IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No. 50 of 2014 Union of India ..…... Appellant(s) Mr. A.K. Mishra, Adv. -Versus- Maheswar M ahendra Pradhan ……. Respondent (s) Mr. Kalpataru Panigrahi, Adv. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 17.10.2025 Order No. 06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. In this Appeal, the Appellant has challenged the order/judgment dated 30.10.2013 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in Original Application No.103 of 2009. 4. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the awarded amount has already been disbursed in fvour of the Respondent in the meantime. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Respondent, since the awarded amount has already Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: P.A. Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 22-Oct-2025 19:01:37 Signature Not Verified 2 been disbursed in favour of the Respondent, the cause of action in the present appeal does not exist. 6. Accordingly, the FAO is disposed of. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu Designation: P.A.