HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15429 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The petitioner claims that he was appointed against a short term vacancy in the year 1994. His claim for regularization was rejected on 10.09.2024. 2. According to petitioner's counsel, the petitioner should be extended the benefit as per the Government Order dated 04.10.2024 issued in pursuance of judgment rendered by this Court in Writ-A No. 21492 of 2023 (Vinod Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. & Others) decided on 30.9.2024. 3. In view of the said fact, the order dated 10.09.2024 is hereby quashed. The matter is remitted to Regional Regularization Committee to accord fresh consideration to the claim of the petitioner keeping in mind the guidelines laid down in paragraph no.149 of the judgment rendered in Vinod Kumar Srivastava (supra) as well as the Government Order dated 04.10.2024, within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the committee. 4. However, it is made clear that in case the Committee of Management or the petitioner does not produce any paper before Regional Regularization Committee for consideration, the Committee, after three dates, will proceed with the matter and decide the same according to material available on record strictly in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that in case salary is being paid to the petitioner, it shall be paid to him till his claim is decided by the Regional Regularization Committee. September 25, 2025 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Indra Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Jitendra Prasad Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad