Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75717 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33722 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt Yashoda Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Girish Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 12.03.2021 (annexure-9) and impugned non bailable warrant dated 30.07.2024 (annexure-10) passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh in Case No. 2125 of 2022 relating to Case Crime No. 0568 of 2019 (State vs. Raj Kumar and others) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 IPC and further to quash the entire proceedings of the impugned Case No. 2125 of 2022 against the applicant. 3. Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is an employee of Special Land Acquisition Office and posted as junior clerk. There is no evidence to prosecute the applicant and the Investigating Officer has not collected any evidence. The applicant has not received the amount in his account. Cognizance/Summoning order passed by learned Magistrate, is without application of judicial mind and the same is liable to be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State submitted that considering the material evidences and allegations against the applicant on record, as on date, as per prosecution case, the cognizable offence against the applicant is made out. Under the facts and circumstances of the present case as well as materials on record against the applicant, the criminal proceedings against the applicant cannot be said to be abuse of process of Court. There is no illegality in the impugned chargesheet and instant 482 Cr.P.C. application is liable to be dismissed. 5. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the entire record, this Court is of the view that it is well settled that the appreciation of evidence is a function of the trial court. This Court in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot assume such jurisdiction and put an end to the process of trial provided under the law. It is also settled by the Apex Court in catena of judgments that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. at pre-trial stage should not be used in a routine manner but it has to be used sprangly, only in such an appropriate case, where on the face of record, the criminal proceeding is clear abuse of the process of the Court. The disputed questions of facts and defence of the accused cannot be taken into consideration at this pre-trial stage. 6. It is also well settled that at the stage of summoning the accused, the court below is not required to go into the merit and demerit of the case. Genuineness or otherwise of the allegation cannot be even determined at the stage of summoning the accused. There is no good ground to invoke inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by this Court at this stage. The relief as claimed by the applicant through this application is refused. 7. The defence version of the applicant has to be considered by the court concerned at the appropriate stage. The accused/applicant has statutory remedy of moving discharge application before the court concerned at the appropriate stage. 8. Considering the material on record, it is directed that, if objection/discharge application is filed on behalf of the applicant before the court concerned within two weeks through counsel, it is expected that the court concerned will consider and decide the same expeditiously within a period of two months in accordance with law. 9. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 Jaswant Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad