IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-27636-2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 TARA RANI KHANNA THROUGH HER LEGAL HEIRS ...Petitioners Versus STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate and Mr. Veer Imaan Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that certain grievances have been raised in the present writ petition but he has instructions to submit that at this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case they are allowed to make a representation to the respondents raising the said grievances before the authority concerned and the same may kindly be ordered to be decided by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner so that the petitioners are satisfied that whatever dues admissible to their late parents be given in the due course. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-UT and Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate, present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.2 HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.18 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-27636-2025 (2) and 3. 4. Learned counsels for the respondents submit that if any representation is received at the hand of the petitioners, the same will be looked into and appropriate order will be passed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order by the authority concerned and in case, it is found that the claim of the petitioners is meritorious, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order for not accepting the claim of the petitioners and the same will be conveyed to them for information and necessary action. 5. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the statement made by learned counsels for the respondents, the present writ petition be disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. 6. Ordered accordingly. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 16, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.18 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment