SMT. KELAWATI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/34971/2025 · 2025-10-12
Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101472 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 101472 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34971 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents and Sri K.N. Singh, learned counsel for New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority").
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to give 5% additional compensation to the petitioners under the strength of the order of this Court in the case of Gajraj v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2011 (11) ADJ 1 and for a direction to respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 27.09.2023 within stipulated period.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the relief prayed in the instant matter, we dispose of the instant petition with liberty to the petitioners to make fresh representation along with true attested copy of the instant order before the Authority-respondent no.4 within two weeks. In the event, such representation is made, the Authority- respondent no.4 consider the claim of the petitioners and ensure that the proceeding shall be finalised expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, thereafter. October 13, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kaushalendra Nath Singh, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Kelawati And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad