Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101461 (PNJ)

RAJENDER PRASAD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/27581/2025 · 2025-09-16

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Rajender Prasad State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek review of order dated 16.01.2023. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that while granting the afore neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability of the remedy that the petitioner may avail. September 16 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27581 of 2025 Date of Decision : Rajender Prasad Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek review of order dated Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that while granting the afore neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability of the remedy that the petitioner may avail. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 6, 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 27581 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.09.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek review of order dated Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we have neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability of the remedy that DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.09.18 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document