SAHJAHAN ANSARI ALIAS SARJHAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2721/2025 · 2025-07-01
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10145 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10145 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:17432] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2721 of 2025
------ Sahjahan Ansari @ Sarjhan Ansari, aged about 28 years, son of Mukhtar Ansari, resident of village- Kuruwa, P.O.- Kuruwa, P.S.- Karmatar, District- Jamtara. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-01-07-2025 I.A. No.7180 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing.
Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2721 of 2025 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.09 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime and he has defrauded the victim Ksrinavasan to the tune of Rs.1,27,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that four mobile phones along with SIM Card were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner
has been in custody since 22.01.2025 as is evident from para-17 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to transfer Rs.1,27,000/- to the Bank Account of Ksrinavasan without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transfer of Rs.1,27,000/- to the Bank Account of Ksrinavasan without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.09 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/