Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10144 (UTT)

DEEP CHAND SAINI AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/904/2024 · 2025-03-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.904 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, B.H. for the State. 3. There is no representation for the private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as charge sheet has already been submitted in the matter on 24.12.2024, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.03.2025 SK