Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10143 (UTT)

DANISH KHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1901/2021 · 2025-03-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1901 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Soniya Chawla, Advocate holding brief of Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as final report has already been submitted in the matter on 27.04.2022, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.03.2025 SK