CRWP-10056- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Balbir Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent dispose of the before the jail authorities, Punjab for grant of parole as the same has been pending decision 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Sect Release) Act, 1962. 4. In the light of the above, a direction to respondent No. final decision on the -2025 (O&M) Sr. No.103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10056 Date of Decision : Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Ankit Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent dispose of the representation dated 10.04.2025 before the jail authorities, Central Jail, Sri Goindwal Sahib, Tarn Taran for grant of parole as the same has been pending decision Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 3 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962. In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.5-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar final decision on the representation dated 10.04.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 10056-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.09.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he prayer to the issuance of directions to respondents to finally dated 10.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner Sri Goindwal Sahib, Tarn Taran for grant of parole as the same has been pending decision. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the ion 3 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary we dispose of the instant petition with Commissioner of Police, Amritsar to take a 10.04.2025 submitted by the VANDANA 2025.09.18 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10056- petitioner for the grant of parole within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. 5. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. September 17 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : -2025 (O&M) for the grant of parole within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE September 17, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No for the grant of parole within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2025.09.18 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document