Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101408 (PNJ)

CHANDI RAM v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/52771/2025 · 2025-09-23

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52771-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23-09-2025 Chandi Ram ........Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab And Others ........Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Akun Sheemar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab. *** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral) FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 66 19.03.2025 Phillaur, District Jalandhar Rural 143, 318(4) BNS 1. Seeking a direction to the police authorities to investigate the FIR captioned above in a fair and impartial manner, the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 528 BNSS, 2023. 2. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be contended and satisfied if respondent no.2-SSP, Jalandhar (Rural) is directed to decide the representation (Annexure P-8) made before him in a time bound manner. 3. Notice served upon the official respondent(s) through State’s counsel. The nature of order this Court proposes to pass, no response of the official respondent(s) is required. 4. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of, with a direction to respondent no.2-SSP, Jalandhar (Rural) to decide the representation (Annexure P-8) submitted by the petitioner, either himself/herself or by delegating the same to any officer not below the rank of IPS, by passing a speaking order, within two months, in accordance with law. The order so passed be communicated to the petitioner as well as to his counsel on his email ID as well. ASHWANI KUMAR 2025.09.25 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-52771-2025 -2- Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court against the order so passed, if required. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 23-09-2025 AK (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ASHWANI KUMAR 2025.09.25 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh