Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 101406 (ALL)

VINAY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14669/2025 · 2025-09-24

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14669 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 25.08.2025 (Annexure No. 3 to this Writ petition)." It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 2 vide representation dated 25.08.2025 which is still pending consideration. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manju Shukla/Ojha, Sheel Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s): C.S.C. Vinay .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. September 25, 2025 IrfanUddin WRIA No. 14669 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad